From: Peter Veotsch ------------------------------------------------------ I use VirtualBox as =A0my hypervisor. =A0It runs well and fast under mint. = =A0I haven't noticed many practical differences between the type 1 and type= 2 hypervisors for workstation use.=0A=0APeter Voetsch=0A=0A=0A
From: Dave Brockman ------------------------------------------------------ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2/10/2013 10:35 PM, Dave Brockman wrote: > Free 2 Good Home: Full Tower ATX Case featuring 11 external 5.25 > bays (divided conveniently into 1 3-bay section and 2 4-bay > sections, for those 4n3 and 5n4 hot plug drive cages) and 1 > external 3.5 bay (dunno wtf for! :>) This was my home file server, > it has a PSU, MLB + RAM, onboard VGA/AUDIO/NIC of some flavor that > worked in Slack 2.4. (best In the interest of full disclosure, I have no idea if the audio worked or not, and the VGA displayed a text console, ummm, like twice after install, otherwise it ran headless. And by Slack 2.4, what my fingers actually meant was Slack on a 2.4 kernel, pre-splash screen GRUB if that helps anyone pull version numbers out of their arse. > I remember single core Athlon XP something w/ nVidia chipset) that > may or may not work (Everything still powered up when I retired it, > the RAID arrays refused to rebuild after a drive failure so I > copied the data to the new file server and powered it off). > > RAID controller, drives, cages *NOT* included. I do have a 4n3 > SATA hot swap cage available for a burrito from Mojo.... > > Anyone interested, please let me know before 2/28. > > Regards, > > dtb -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRGGf6AAoJEMP+wtEOVbcd4nkIAK/8J7LEerk9dESoOVX/VBwc HasATr0wM/IuqY5v9Pjj1UXl90ZjQKo+9OZY5f1TFPYsqXdLjSR5/7ou5vv2rak2 CFS4iyhAcrEa+c8IwrONTimbPKnTzC7c+DR0rHu1Zs1f7bwDabMiCdhp16D528S8 7tT7EdvCu3qZdgO1DsJIH8oXPxc0L/yCyhm6QuRoaJbGW9qWsP+LxB2dYIEaeG0H fx9Bq7eqx9TyZHCcKYoO3f7vVVPs1RVqMjc9a6v0iOcnewblyj7ABhZamYF4Asgf vDCo/PAMvs5mmVXgY476PT2TyWKAUllkciDKzT4yA4qV7kvdMESHvXXwGf8F330= =L0Vw -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From: Stephen Kraus ------------------------------------------------------ http://developers.slashdot.org/story/12/12/29/018234/linus-chews-up-kernel-maintainer-for-introducing-userspace-bug I found this rather good.
From: Dave Brockman ------------------------------------------------------ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 https://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git;a=commit;h=743aa456c1834f76982af44e8b71d1a0b2a82e21 Ingo submitted it, Linus "pulled" the patch into his repo. Regards, dtb - -- "Some things in life can never be fully appreciated nor understood unless experienced firsthand. Some things in networking can never be fully understood by someone who neither builds commercial networking equipment nor runs an operational network." RFC 1925 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlDI8u4ACgkQABP1RO+tr2QaJwCfUHGy6NXVJR0YeQz+JA/GbNN4 SzEAoIlCLHjJmbxM25Om7CK6r4+Fh1r4 =XAG+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From: JonathanCalloway ------------------------------------------------------ Hi! I have been using Fedora for over two years now. However, I grew very weary of updates (especially kernel updates) breaking things like wireless and VMWare Player. I couldn't get VMWare Player (4 or 5) running under Fedora 17 no matter what I did. (Before someone flames me about not using VirtualBox, I need VMWare Player for the classes I teach). Two weeks ago, I finally had enough. I downloaded Ubuntu 12.04 and used it to blow away my Fedora partition, and star from scratch. Within two hours I had a fully functional system with all my data (email accounts and Google Calendar in Evolution) and applications installed. I was feeling pretty happy until VMWare player started complaining that I didn't have enough swap space for it to run optimally. So, I downloaded System Rescue CD, and used GParted to decrease my ext4 partition, and increase my swap space. Viola! Ununtu booted right back up and now VMWare Player doesen't complain anymore. I'm still getting used to Unity. I think I'll give it a few more days before I start installing other GUIs. At any rate, the last time I used Ubuntu was about 4 years or so ago, when I messed around with Ubuntu Studio a little bit. I must admit, I am pretty impressed with how far it has come.
From: "kitepilot@kitepilot.com" ------------------------------------------------------ Well, I wiped out Mint and installed Debian squeeze. All good now... :) ET kitepilot@kitepilot.com writes: > Well, I was able to determine that the 'malloc' error is happening in *MY* > box (I thought it was happening on the *other* box), so I booted my box > with a 'Rescatux' CD, installed SSH, did: > ssh -fCXY user@remote virtualbox > and it worked... > > What that means to me is that both, the last Xubuntu and the last Mint, > have some weird interaction (kernel, video drivers, chipset, who knows) > that causes the problem. > > I am also having issues because my box was either rebooting X or rebooting > the whole enchilada, so I did run a memtest86+ for several hours without > issues and I expect the hardware to be trustworthy. > It is some sort of hardware disliking software issue. > Or so I hope.. > > Now the question that I am trying to answer is: > which distro should I install to avoid this nightmare? > The quest goes on... > ET > > PS: This box has an ATI video card, should I expect a Nvidia to have > better results? I have always have a better luck with Nvidia, but > YMMV... > > > > > kitepilot@kitepilot.com writes: > >> Well, the Gnomes are at work (again) in my box and I could certainly use >> some help to evict them... >> >> This is what's happening: >> I use: >> 'ssh -fCXY user@remotebox run-something' >> a lot. >> Works every time. >> Or 'mostly' every time... >> >> Now when I run (ONLY from *MY* box): >> ssh -fCXY turboviking virtualbox >> I get: >> *** glibc detected *** /usr/lib/virtualbox/VirtualBox: malloc(): memory >> corruption: 0x099c5e48 *** >> And a long trace. >> >> This is the quick rundown of how it broke: >> My desktop was having hiccups and I decided to replace whatever I had >> (can't remember what) with the latest Xubuntu. >> After that, the problem started. >> This problem, coupled with other issues, led me to scrap Xubuntu and >> install the latest Mint/Mate. >> Problem didn't go away... >> The Xubuntu and Mint installations were fresh from-scratch installs, the >> only thing I preserved was my home directory. >> >> So the conclusion was evident: there is something in my /home/directory >> causing the problem. >> Nope... >> Created another user, rebooted the box and logged in with the new user. >> Same $#!T... :( >> >> Now, ANYTHING else that I have fired up works just fine. >> And If I run the exact same instruction from other of my local boxes, it >> works fine too! >> It is ONLY 'vitualbox in my box' that fails. >> But it used to work just fine... >> >> Now the (unsolvable and incomprehensible to me) question is: >> What could possibly be breaking the whole 'remote SSH run' mechanism >> (ONLY for Virtualbox) in my box, which used to work fine before, and >> works fine from everywhere else. >> Other than sacrificing another goat and burying some transistors and >> garlic wrapped on anti-static paper at midnite with no Moon, I don't know >> what to do... >> >> I have seen Virtualbox do weird things before when ran it remotely under >> X/SSH, but this blows my (little) mind. :( >> Any ideas? >> Sight... >> ET >>
From: Garrett Gaston ------------------------------------------------------ I am in the process of partitioning right now=2C after I create four partit= ions the remaining 225 gigs says unusable and I cant partition any more. From: boodaddy@gmail.com Date: Thu=2C 7 Jun 2012 22:09:46 -0400 Subject: Re: [Chugalug] Thanks Lynn To: chugalug@chugalug.org Hmm... with a 250 gig drive=2C its pretty much personal preference. 500 meg for /boot should be plenty=2C and give you extra room if you want t= o keep alot of kernels on hand For Ubuntu server=2C you wont need alot of space in / if you just install t= he "base" (which is run level 3). But=2C if you want to install Gnome=2C an= d other stuff=2C might be a good idea to give / around 15 gig or so give /usr a few gig to be safe. Maybe 5? For swap=2C a good rule of thumb is to give it around twice what your physi= cal ram size is if you have less than 4 gig ram. =20 Split up the remaining space to /home and /data as you need. =20 You user data will be stored in /home so it can grow pretty quickly. I kee= p stuff like ISO's=2C applications=2C movies and what not in /data so spitt= ling the space up between /home and /data is just base on how you plan to u= se them. But=2C the good thing with LVM=2C is that if you do all those filesystems (= except /boot of course) as a logical volume=2C you can always resize them l= ater on... so if you need to remove free space on one to give to another it= s not a big deal and is easily done. Hope that helps! On Thu=2C Jun 7=2C 2012 at 10:01 PM=2C Garrett Gaston wrote: I mean thanks Lynn. From: boodaddy@gmail.com Date: Thu=2C 7 Jun 2012 21:47:17 -0400 Subject: Re: [Chugalug] partitioning Ubuntu server To: chugalug@chugalug.org Heres what I would do: Use ext4 on all partitions create a /boot as its only parition... 500 meg or so Then create a logical volume on the rest of the space and setup LVM Then=2C do your other volumes as an LVM. I do separate LVM logicals for th= e following: / /home (most of my space goes here) /usr swap /data (I use this for general data storage I dont want to keep in home=2C = or if I have files I want to share with other users. I absoultely love LVM! On Thu=2C Jun 7=2C 2012 at 9:40 PM=2C Garrett Gaston wrote: I've got an idle desktop setting here and I've decided to install and try U= buntu server on it. I'll mostly use it for learning purposes and maybe a li= ttle file storage=2C file server=2C nad media streaming. How many partition= s should I make out of this and should they be ext3 or 4? I'M still learnin= g to please forgive me here guys. =20
From: Jonathan Calloway ------------------------------------------------------ Greetings! I have been thinking about trying to build bootable Linux machine using LFS for learning purposes. However, I heard a very interesting podcast today about Gentoo. While I've heard of Gentoo before, I didn't realize that it requires you to compile your own kernel etc. That got me to wondering, if you want to 'learn', what would the difference between using LFS and Gentoo be? Also, what about Slackware? All three give an installation experience that has been automated in recent years by Anaconda and the like. So, I will be interested in finding out what your collective opinions are. Thanks! Jonathan Calloway
From: Eric Wolf ------------------------------------------------------ NOTE: The Coffee Shop accepts CASH ONLY. I'll be in town for the weekend. So I'm calling the meeting. It's entirely social in nature. For those who don't know, the Coffee Shop happens to be where CHUGALUG was formed. Trying to dig back into ancient history, Higher Technology Services was upstairs in the Doctor's Building. They ran a sizable FidoNet node. Regular lunch meetups occured in the Coffee Shop. Eventually, Mike and Dan decided the BBS needed Usenet feeds so they cobbled together a fractional T1 and, with some help from Robert Wilson, got a pre-1.0 kernel Linux system to connect. Then they leaned about SLIP and realized the same hardware could provide direct connections to the 'Net. Thus was born Chattanooga Online at a time when Mosaic was still a science project at NCSA, the nearest 9600 baud modem was America Online in Nashville, and Windows was for Workgroups. Eventually, HTS/COL moved downstairs directly across from the Coffee Shop. CHUGALUG was formed as a LUG focused on advanced applications of Linux (specifically, we never held installfests like CALUG). The name CHUGALUG came from Larry Burton, one of the Chia regulars. So there's history in them thar tables! -=--=---=----=----=---=--=-=--=---=----=---=--=-=- Eric B. Wolf 720-334-7734
From: John Aldrich ------------------------------------------------------ Ok, I give up on Pangolin. My laptop is unuseable with KUbuntu Pangolin installed. I'm going back to Ocelot. It worked, although it was slightly buggy. I didn't have to worry about manually hacking the grub.conf file to add "nomodeset" to the command-line for the kernel, and my desktop didn't crash every time I switched to a VT and it DIDN'T take 10 minutes to load everything. This is NOT an "old" laptop... it's got like 4 Gigs of RAM, and Ocelot was fine with it, so I'm going back to Ocelot. Someone let me know when they have the bugs worked out of Pangolin and I'll switch. I'm guessing they'll have the bugs worked out about the time they release Quiescent Quetzel, so I'll just stay one release behind and be happy! It's not like I'm trying to use my laptop as a desktop replacement or anything. All I want to do is browse the web with it, but Pangolin just didn't like my hardware, I guess. :(
From: Dave Brockman ------------------------------------------------------ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I *know* this is not a good idea. With that being said, are /etc/sysctl.conf (kernel.panic = # > 0) and /proc/sys/kernel/panic still where you check/set reboot after panic? And does it still work? Regards, dtb -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEUEARECAAYFAk+QoO0ACgkQABP1RO+tr2QHRQCgtPV4K+SsY1UKPmQuR6IA2Qpz WBwAmMauNykQFr1cpW5P21YFhJjpJPU= =5LXl -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From: Lynn Dixon ------------------------------------------------------ I have a RHEL 6.2 64bit install thats running on a Cisco UCS blade. I have an EMC Symmetrix VMAX LUN that is given to the machine and it has 4 FCoE multipaths setup. I installed the OS using "basic storage" and did a standard run level 3 install. Redhat recognized the multipaths and just setup dm multipaths automatically. The machine ran fine with no probs. Then I decided to install the latest PowerPath .rpm (got 5.6 from the powerlink website today). So, I commented out everything in /etc/multipath.conf, and disabled the multipath services from running. Rebooted, and then I installed the PowerPath .rpm. It ran, no errors, so I did the license registration. Heres the kicker, I an run powermt list dev=all (I think thats the command) and it will succesfully show me all of my FcOE paths, so I thought it was golden. I did powermt save, and rebooted. Poop hit the fan. RHEL will boot, go through the lower numbered inits, and even mount and fsck the LVM volumes I am using.....but, once it gets to the PowerPath service in init, it kernel panicks, and just refuses to boot at all. The only way I knew to get it back was to boot to resuce, and move the powerpath scripts from /etc/init.d to /root and reboot. Any one else come across this? It know it has to be a simple fix...or I hope. Thanks!
From: Chad Smith ------------------------------------------------------ I've been thinking a lot about tablets lately. I have bought and sold a good number of them - several different operating systems - and have played with as many as I could get my hands on. I have kinda been wondering - what advantages - if any - are there to Android being Linux? I realize from Google's perspective it makes things easier, not having to rebuild the wheel in making and maintaining their own kernel... But is there really any other advantage? To my understanding, you can just run any old Linux application on Android - it has to be specifically ported to Android before it will work. And I realize, too, there is at least some sort of a victory for Linux supporters saying "Linux has gone mainstream!" But - pragmatically, for users - and maybe for hardware makers / app developers - does it really matter if it's a Linux kernel or a WebOS/Palm kernel or a BlackBerry kernel or some mythical custom Google kernel, etc.? And if it does - why? There's no point this this question other than idle curiosity. It's not any kind of attack or anything else. *- Chad W. Smith* *"I like a man who's middle name is W."* President George W. Bush - February 10, 2003 bit.ly/gwb-dubya
From: Randy Yates ------------------------------------------------------ I'm about to build a new computer tomorrow for my main desktop, and I thought I'd bring an old subject back up. What's your favorite distro and why? I'm strongly leaning toward Debian Testing because I love Debian but I want newer packages. I'm not a big fan of Gnome 3 or Unity, though I may settle with Gnome Classic. I'll be developing, using Netbeans/Eclipse, Blender, The Gimp, Inkscape, and a few others. I'd like good multimedia support especially when it comes to good audio configuration out-of-the-box. I have an MS Live Chat headset that worked perfectly in one distro (I believe it was Ubuntu) but takes a bit of time to get functioning properly in Debian. How's 64-bit flash these days? At one time I was opting for 32bit OS installs with PAE kernels so I could use all my RAM just because 64bit flash wasn't agreeable. Let me know your thoughts. -- Google reads my email!
From: John Aldrich ------------------------------------------------------ So I have this Compaq Presario F750 that's been giving me occasional weird errors returning from suspend. I'm getting an error "ATA3: revalidation failed" and an error number, but I don't recall the error number. Doing a quick Google search I see that others have had similar problems, only they fail to boot. Mine will boot just fine, it's coming out of hibernation/suspension when I occasionally get that error. System is running KUbuntu 11.10 with kernel 3.0.0-14
From: Rod-Lists ------------------------------------------------------ I have and old lime green iMac(i dubbed the crabapple) that I have run x on before. somewhere about when Ubuntu went chocolate the we started having issues with x. But before you haters start it is not ubuntu. I've been trying Debian squeeze now and getting the same problems. Screen goes black and power button yellow. Comes out of it when you switch to a cli tty. X messages state mach64 module not found. Some research shows that this is an issue on sparc and intel as well. Red Hat, arch it doesn't matter. So who the hell broke ATI support in the kernel? XORG is fickle & heathen god!
From: Rod-Lists ------------------------------------------------------ Does the atom 330 support Kernel vitalization (KVM)?
From: Cameron Kilgore ------------------------------------------------------ A lot of you probably heard of CarrierIQ by now, but here's a video demoing
From: John Aldrich ------------------------------------------------------ Ok, I'm finally getting around to trying to upgrade my machine and replace the failing boot drive. Only problem is, I'm out of SATA connections. :( Anyone got a recommendation for a good, linux-compatible SATA controller? I *do* have PCIE slots on my motherboard, and I think I have one PCI slot available (or will have once I take out my IDE controller.) I see a Highpoint Rocket 620 on NewEgg for about $30 that's SATA3 and PCIE 2.0, backwards compatible to PCIE1.0. Is that a good card? According to NewEgg it's Linux compatible with kernel 2.6.19 and above (I'm on Kernel 2.6.40, so I've got that covered!) I just thought as long as I'm going to be buying a SATA controller, I might as well get the most bang for the buck! :D Thanks!
From: Lynn Dixon ------------------------------------------------------ So, we have RHEL6 machine that is connected to several serial devices that do monitoring in a lab over a serial-to-ethernet hub using an Avocent ESP16. I have the kernel compiled and the driver installed from Avocent correctly, and the OS sees the new serials. The people that make the instruments cant get the OS to "see" the devices stating that the ports need to be configured as such: Port type (Terminal) Configure Port (Incoming only) Speed ( 9600) Data bits (8) Parity (None) The driver software created 16 tty devices in /dev that are called ttyQ01e0 through ttyQ01ef How do I configure these ports in unix with those parameters (N-8-1) at 9600 baud.? I have never messed with serial before in Linux :(