Chattanooga
Unix
Gnu
Android
Linux
Users
Group

 

Hot Topics:

Sponsoring:

Linode Deploys Servers with the Same SSH Key

From: David White 
------------------------------------------------------
I know some of you guys use Linode (including me - for some of my stuff).
Fortunately, I don't use Ubuntu.

But this is serious stuff:
http://news.softpedia.com/news/linode-vps-host-accidentally-deploys-servers-with-the-same-ssh-key-500192.shtml

I'm quickly losing faith with these guys and may decide to migrate more of
my stuff off of them in the future...

-- 
David White
Founder & CEO

423-693-4234
@developCENTS 
https://developcents.com

*Develop CENTS*
Computing, Equipping, Networking, Training & Supporting for small
businesses and nonprofits
Providing: Web Hosting, Technical Support & IT Consulting

*Signup to our Newsletter at
https://developcents.com/contact/
*

Possible to use switch behind EPB hand-off?

From: David White 
------------------------------------------------------
I have a client who has 2 static IP addresses that are assigned to 2
separate firewalls.

The client has 2 retail stores right next to each other. Same parent
company owns the retail stores, but different IP address for each store,
and the powers that be for each retail store requires separate hardware,
and doesn't want their own firewall touching the other retail store's
firewall.

They even have refused to configure one of the firewalls to act as a
passthrough to the 2nd firewall.

I talked to someone from EPB earlier today, as I wanted to get a 2nd
hand-off from the white Alcatel-Lucent Fiber-to-Copper boxes that EPB has
on-site. That box has 4 LAN ports, but only 2 are in use (1 is for phones).

I was told that to get a 3rd port activated for the 2nd IP address, that we
would have to pay for a completely separate EPB connection.

So the guy I talked to suggested getting a router instead. But each of the
corporate firewalls are configured on the public IP addresses. So if I put
in a router, I would need to get a 3rd IP address, and then have the
firewalls reconfigured to use the router's public IP address as the
gateway, right?

I asked about putting in a switch in instead, and the guy said that
wouldn't work.

But I don't see why it wouldn't work, since the firewalls are already
configured on the public IP address.

Am I missing something?

-- 
David White
Founder & CEO

423-693-4234
@developCENTS 
https://developcents.com

*Develop CENTS*
Computing, Equipping, Networking, Training & Supporting for small
businesses and nonprofits
Providing: Web Hosting, Technical Support & IT Consulting

*Signup to our Newsletter at
https://developcents.com/contact/
*

Chatt State Matrix Longest Running Torrent

From: Dave Brockman 
------------------------------------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

http://www.techworm.net/2016/01/even-after-4419-days-the-worlds-oldest-t
orrent-is-still-going-strong.html

Regards,

dtb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJWppm1AAoJEMP+wtEOVbcdWKoIAKwV9vtb303Koh5m4RTCk46f
89RvzmANVw2W+EMTG4n6Dx8CyKTyLLpz3fEsAIssTdKvPd3vO+/nZrKvtWDEETzW
PhbtZECe8NRafgCNjWlDBAVgvVMN/YTpOc6nvbO+f1tNEOeRTE096Z08XhfJwhgK
0FFBMh+hQMUvPYQtUl2aVHnAd3vfgoDKEjqRr2yx8aAZQiPopvTrAetD7cvJ3syY
kDYGVR85o3KcGBDdwJJmudotARUFokicvKbZL8huDwroj2tWsyqiqxej6dr4lCpp
jdUlqjVHW3D7Xtzah0c5qjgLnY2r2hc28ECbwF61FcPQ+xe/+2T8GbE2lZIywiI=
=DZ89
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Linode Password Reset

From: Dave Brockman 
------------------------------------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

https://blog.linode.com/2016/01/05/security-notification-and-linode-mana
ger-password-reset/

I know a couple of you on list have Linodes, I haven't received my email
notification as of yet, but this came across my screen...

Regards,

dtb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJWjBQQAAoJEMP+wtEOVbcd9M0IAK43kUzqOvt7fzio5d+lggo2
us1MjazY8xvEEs3O4l8Xf0YE8bbgnJzhkwavyyNkD84oboNflJPTYIe2ktTIhCaK
ud5cmrYZnRS8xKxPpxmcoULNuvBms9rYyVu9WwLKw0ykdv+xDCpJ6hZKfgJtVbGY
3YlOvPzJ5QVmELPa/DgXpRsCE8Z5YuqAyUxPxW1GiV3YytyM0oCe2nfXzmq0skcR
L2PL5ZhDOBI1w5Y2TRjAQpyUGTcxBm3spBS8ZqnvbjPWcI/JpKrSSt+nAKAq1siv
ZI8ErydOvIMPQ7GEiU/IoO55+eXjT4jSRlA+kpC/n6oHk2ET7JswoEZ2lPMsBrc=
=1rAr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2.4 Kernel + Network Bridging

From: Dave Brockman 
------------------------------------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Does anyone have a concise reference as to what network bridging is
supposed to look like under 4.2 kernels?  I want a VLAN Trunk interface
incoming to my eth0.  I am OK with a separate bridge per VLAN, although
the single vlan-aware bridge seems like the real choice.  I want the
native (untagged) and tagged VLANs to participate and pass traffic.

This works:

iface eth0 inet manual
auto vmbr0
iface vmbr0 inet static
	address x.x.x.x
	netmask y.y.y.0
	gateway x.x.x.1
	bridge

Public Key Server

From: Dave Brockman 
------------------------------------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Is anyone on list running a public keyserver?  Even if it's a private
keyserver, you probably have knowledge I seek... anyone?

Regards,

dtb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJWIFWhAAoJEMP+wtEOVbcdR8QH/2FG2STJFH+EVoICNIVXpnc/
RDh8irnxSvAWko4OL8f89b2a4ezfjJSHRgVn9yAcfHGuf1MecKNub5wjdVVVfzaz
V/ssUY2OLFJeWo8Fz1DmDqvr6CtOtCOUdw/T/U4JEaH2tErcCIBUTcqFBfya5c5y
Lfcar43xB2nS+ZETxQaY4NXLL6ao/eNN4+36Fjg4WM4cYZBUvvQwv9t2wUZV7VDC
IFpJVltBPlOVguLN/Wt8G1D5simqN2/7/g+gzcvCZK0UxqJnnU9ww9tp9kZK0lD8
3yissqpZLojrhZMqqZS7N7WQB8HyqEx6vDuEvTwJD8vcIt8+kyD9IIy5wRXpFwM=
=RjCo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

EPB introduces CGNAT on Residential Circuits

From: Dave Brockman 
------------------------------------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Just curious if anyone else received the CGNAT upgrade from EPB last
night?  If your "WAN" IP is between 100.64.0.0 - 100.127.255.255, you
are now behind CGNAT.  Checking your outside IP from ipchicken.com or
similar should give you a different IP address, the range mentioned
above is not globally routed (think RFC1918, like 192.168.X.X).
  I suspect the NAT portion wasn't working correctly first thing this
morning, but even after they restored "Internet" connectivity to my
circuit, I could not complete IPSEC tunnels across the CGNAT.  Debug
logs show the initial ISAKMP packets are correct (the Tunnel-Group Name
and Secret are successfully exchanged), but subsequent ISAKMP packets
appeared to be manged by the state/NAT machine (ISAKMP proposals were
stripped from ISAKMP packets beyond the initial exchange, although the
modified packets did reach both ends).  Very strange behavior indeed.
  To be fair, EPB did put me back on a real IP address upon request.
But I really wish they had applied the effort and expense spent upon
CGNAT deployment on IPv6 deployment.  I hope this current round of
short-sightedness from whoever dictates what they will sell to whom for
how many donuts has not spread to the people who design the network and
plan its future expansion.  100Mb/s or 1000Mb/s just makes CGNAT suck
harder and faster, not any less.

Regards,

dtb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJWHur1AAoJEMP+wtEOVbcdiC4IAKsrvVg+0TmRzUMZPOMzZp3j
3LJvZx0R0i3gw2xt33aLlDkjL6pJP4roabHBaZfCvqP7wRWBq4+Vvg/wL99a78P4
Q/mZU+A0t7rEsQWd7ssQ0VArJ5oUVyf5LAAcEMyaAlkFBVElCj+JT7/DAHuZygbN
ft6hcIM7XWiNZhxSbGXi/S1MQZRS+RZ6RxNTZjq6OauCZCReiq/3/WAHYidTejKa
Xo8Hulzem0JLH+twCfGwtZxviGLlQqrTiFKsV40qJPvrRpm4zLLTy/nl+t92hHLq
0kDhComwnBXYeWFkCbepdq3o4yXeZMHerAnVt6yFCIjCRzJP3KYZxp5vU85vIoM=
=xMZ1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

IPv6 EPB from EPB

From: Mike Harrison 
------------------------------------------------------
=46rom a good technical source inside EPB when asked about IPv6:

"Yes but it's on specific nodes. We are still installing equipment in =
the network. Users have to request a conversion as well.=E2=80=9D

So in some places, it=E2=80=99s possible, it will be probably eventually =
be everywhere.

=E2=80=94Mike--




> On Sep 11, 2015, at 10:12 AM, David White  =
wrote:
>=20
> I just spoke with someone at EPB Support (who happens to be someone =
I've
> worked with in person in the past and I can confirm he knows his stuff
> fairly well), and he told me that this is still just a rumor. They =
haven't
> been told anything yet, and he said they must still be working on
> deployment.
>=20
> As for the tunnel, yes, I'm aware of that. But per Ben's comment, it =
would
> be really nice to have something natively.
>=20
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 9:33 AM, Benjamin Stewart =
> wrote:
>=20
>> As I recall, the fun thing about tunnels was that, by design, =
everything
>> prefers IPv6 over IPv4, if both are available. My tunnel provider did =
not
>> provide a tunnel that was anywhere close to as fast as EPB, meaning =
it was
>> good for testing, and then I turned it off.
>>=20
>> On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 10:10 PM, Dave Brockman 
>> wrote:
>>=20
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>=20
>>> On 9/10/2015 9:13 PM, David White wrote:
>>>> Would it work if I only have a dynamic connection? I don't have a =
stat
>>> ic
>>>> but would love to have IPv6 for testing purposes...
>>>=20
>>> You can turn up a tunnel and test several years ago (free).  Pretty =
sure
>>> you can configure it with a dynamic connection, just you'll =
obviously
>>> have to edit things on the far end when your IP changes.
>>>=20
>>> Regards,
>>>=20
>>> dtb
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>> Version: GnuPG v2
>>>=20
>>> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJV8jgfAAoJEMP+wtEOVbcd/zMH/1fvbWKc3i7GMJzs6ToiAy2s
>>> liM2g9PHxji+IDE6XWnCY+6WM4X3sx40nYXYwLSyjzmoD/SZbMH0XgHfxnzh5nmW
>>> hrcyQcTeOxrhju9+jQ0BKDzNXeYgZThdjtDp4b63IErV5e9sZnalCoL3wZhiNJqv
>>> gF9tpLeHV+9OeF4VDF95v/fUcXGdxqhnGjCvKpmczo79aK2FAnTNak9ISa9xb+sd
>>> uvLfoY91CDHUImiu5xKfoVZBYevpGjnj3ZZ8JC61Lw0f/tGJr/Jd6rLXFwXIQcEn
>>> XSjKxI7hHPMdpooZqwaMQ/p1HHm2EJtndGMj/pH4AcKk4TyFXVgGOnUwvjpcbvA=3D
>>> =3DsnYA
>>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>> 

[OT] Filter Test, Pardon Noise

From: Dave Brockman 
------------------------------------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

You know that time I didn't take my own advice, and ended up wasting
days of my life because of it?  This is one of those, my apologies for
the noise.

Regards,

dtb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJV6fmGAAoJEMP+wtEOVbcdsvEIAJy36VS984BPH1OYb+uSwdoP
dR90MYfWQNEKsxEZZAVEgHeQ2UkGy465+JKqfLZ3WOX3ENCzMRE7wAc1bCsh92kQ
JlnG7km/AFVLDPtTwaiGW0+rpSLfSaT7ZNpubLryQkA3/5nSSGWv+z7DdntAp5Oz
O1Xs+iy0F3B5pJ350RSSHwri0a5DoGBdP2M7w4DQU7VbKkfkJASkhtPL6GTNCOsv
rtf6mxHaAXOCasWE5MtVfZV49oOeCghhUC1MzJMIgXznELeoNfdT3aCZfzdzB3Ae
xqToI+Pq/519u0uvtN2y+aUKR1AEzOZELCkRdH5joxVCSL76O3PpFfV57QbczH0=
=0kND
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Part 2 - (Was Google (and others?) marking my email as spam)

From: David White 
------------------------------------------------------
Well, I continue to have issues with my email going into people's spam
boxes.

I even had 1 message yesterday that Google didn't deliver, period (it
wasn't even in the user's spam folder). That message was a test to a friend
of mine who is also a client, and could have been filtered out because it
was a bit weird to being with.

I had a similar situation occur with a friend about a month ago whose email
was is hosted in Microsoft Live (I sent a test message, he didn't even get
it, even in his spam).

So I have evidence that some of my email isn't even getting to the intended
recipients.

Reviewing mail server logs, however, I can confirm a 250 delivered report
that the mail server successfully connected to the receiving mail server
and delivered the message.

Yesterday, I implemented DKIM, and this morning, I implemented DMARC.

This seems very, very ridiculous that I have to enable DMARC on a domain
that runs a single email address.

But I see no other way for me to get to the bottom of this.

If anyone has any additional suggestions, troubleshooting advice, etc..., I
would be grateful. This hurting me and my business.

- David

On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Dave Brockman  wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I don't think this is the right direction.  Many SMTP servers exhibit
> this behavior as they hand off to different processes to perform
> different functions.  Delivery to G is a PITA honestly, but time and
> volume usually helps with this.  I have a whole config file dealing with
> G quirks, beginning with forcing delivery over IPv4 :(
>
> Regards,
>
> dtb
>
> On 5/15/2015 11:00 AM, Wil Wade wrote:
> > I am guessing here, but I suspect that any header with localhost is
> > getting flagged. It should read the name and address of the server.
> >
> > On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 10:27 AM, David White  > > wrote:
> >
> >     Why would the localhost / 127.0.0.1 be an issue?
> >
> >     Postfix "receives" / processes the message a couple different time
> s
> >     on different daemons, I believe. Therefore, the localhost thing
> >     would make sense.
> >
> >     On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 10:22 AM, Wil Wade  >     > wrote:
> >
> >         I believe this is what it may be getting hung up on:
> >
> >         On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 10:10 AM, David White
> >          wrote:
> >
> >             Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
> >               by mail.developcents.com 
> (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5BC73C74;
> >               Thu, 14 May 2015 15:27:15 +0000 (UTC)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >         

Senior Storage Engineer position in Chattanooga, great rate available

From: Matt Keys 
------------------------------------------------------
I've confirmed it's TVA.

Drone with camera

From: Dave Brockman 
------------------------------------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I need an aerial view of a building or area of downtown from a
different location, approximately 3 miles away, and approximately
80-100 feet up.  Anyone on-list have equipment that can perform these
duties and willing to help a fellow lugger out?  Willing to supply
lunch or adult libations in return.

Related topic for the hams, I've heard that ham towers can be erected
with minimal or no interference from local government.  Is anyone
aware of any actual ordinances restricting ham towers within city
limits?  And if this project comes to fruition, does anyone with
experience installing and grounding ham towers wish to have a deeper
conversation?

Regards,

dtb


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVt6s9AAoJEMP+wtEOVbcdYDIH/RHDvu3q7Jhgx/2hN5VQWaeU
hdAPm6crvckbCczzp67eSlleqgoIk0P7iQROZX3c2PUn08voGbqy24yqpiSGzZPW
s+UFIYVlLTcOg/3PS8sxgc2l7r+qe9JU2tN0BtjGTsxb/I7cRvI4GoYmNRH4cwGP
X4/aLC1NITVlxSdnWaxsURL1KqT28nrolhtq5lTMlKvmuibQSKWRtnB9E/K/2wm7
3THXlnDguLnj8TWh1H4cGZBnOMUolWsCFGwFPs5VmJp8hJgiXQpbbERFM8tqVj8G
jCxo8+zdCCQjUITlT8xoFdCwuJFofsk4yt4VFRVKE+xgu40iw+wF4l2aJ3vtzv4=
=6Whq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

FreePBX Call Recording Issue (Stephen Kraus)

From: Justin McAteer 
------------------------------------------------------
Could be that the call is being setup with media directly between the phone=
s. What type of interface are you using for your external calls?
Thanks=2C=0A=

Justin McAteer=0A=

(256) 694-9195


> From: chugalug-request@chugalug.org
> Subject: Chugalug Digest=2C Vol 36=2C Issue 22
> To: chugalug@chugalug.org
> Date: Tue=2C 21 Jul 2015 23:00:54 +0000
>=20
> Send Chugalug mailing list submissions to
> 	chugalug@chugalug.org
>=20
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web=2C visit
> 	http://chugalug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/chugalug
> or=2C via email=2C send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	chugalug-request@chugalug.org
>=20
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	chugalug-owner@chugalug.org
>=20
> When replying=2C please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Chugalug digest..."
>=20
>=20
> Today's Topics:
>=20
>    1. FreePBX Call Recording Issue (Stephen Kraus)
>    2. Review of Ubuntu Phone Was | Long Post: Smartphone rant	(Take
>       2?) (Rod-Lists)
>    3. Re: Review of Ubuntu Phone Was | Long Post: Smartphone rant
>       (Take 2?) (John Aldrich)
>    4. Re: Review of Ubuntu Phone Was | Long Post: Smartphone rant
>       (Take 2?) (Michael Scholten)
>    5. Re: Review of Ubuntu Phone Was | Long Post: Smartphone rant
>       (Take 2?) (Rod-Lists)
>    6. Forum Software (David Rucker)
>    7. Re: Forum Software (David White)
>=20
>=20
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>=20
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue=2C 21 Jul 2015 16:17:47 -0400
> From: Stephen Kraus 
> To: CHUGALUG 
> Subject: [Chugalug] FreePBX Call Recording Issue
> Message-ID:
> 	

txt parse challenge (already awarded trophy to Dan)

From: Dave Brockman 
------------------------------------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

So I spent part of the weekend playing with this little gem, plus some
additional scripting to delete and move some files, and I haven't seen
Dan throw us a perl 1liner in a day or two, so I thought I'd invite the
rest of the list to share their solutions.  I always enjoy seeing the
different ways the list deals with text parsing.  Come one, come all,
any language, any shell.  Except Dan, who is restricted to perl and 22
characters.  (# randomly pulled out of my arse, feel free to ignore it).

Source File:
#########BEGIN FILE#########
 Directory of C:\usr\share\data

06/03/2015  06:55 PM             4,288 HELP.TXT
               1 File(s)          4,288 bytes

 Directory of C:\usr\share\xxxx

06/03/2015  01:12 PM             4,288 HELP.TXT
               1 File(s)          4,288 bytes

 Directory of C:\usr\share\Shares\xxxCONTENT - XXXX

06/03/2015  11:42 AM             4,288 HELP.TXT
               1 File(s)          4,288 bytes
########END FILE############

Desired Result File:
###############BEGIN FILE####
 Directory of C:\usr\share\data
 Directory of C:\usr\share\xxxx
 Directory of C:\usr\share\Shares\xxxCONTENT - XXXX
###########END FILE###########

Bonus Result File:
############BEGIN FILE#########
C:\usr\share\data
C:\usr\share\xxxx
C:\usr\share\Shares\xxxCONTENT - XXXX
###########END FILE################
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVkcnYAAoJEMP+wtEOVbcddNMH/1cFnpONKSLDHessSdcefaRX
BlGNSaXFIzN3rok4RYIFaCZ2ZSGteKFy/fXAORsMMgP8qiWXmx2YEHaZwjCpuY2I
PoyVIaE0X449xaejyDPC8j6Pqikc5nxOoOMlIpsc9MKK2NmWaN1/cYR0pIn/a0Ak
j5SzbgJ/UfVgjcbOn2kGhwbnzhnlogRoV8RW1VKX2+2LFQF0gYdboOHNzQO3B+Hb
GnVDhxE8XZ2DELgZ5Fm7sISATCLOESig5b6weM4tFlM6cM6YGPqG0AP5wSWatzv1
H5S0aEPbbS9besLoj/JDr4OPLFZgsKvNNunTUJVSC6zfWBqAVguFESQymsGIWp4=
=rg/S
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Dell PA-13 Power brick

From: Dave Brockman 
------------------------------------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

http://www.amazon.com/Dell-PA-13-Charger-Inspiron-Notebooks/dp/B000MMDZK
I

Anyone have one of these they can put in my hand today or tomorrow?

I've checked for universal kits, but all I can find in-store are 

Fwd: Chuga-get-together

From: Jonathan Calloway 
------------------------------------------------------
Hello!

Not sure if anyone has seen this yet.  It looks like Thursday night will be "=
The Night" at this point.

I like Terminal Brew House.  However, I'm counting on you guys to chime in w=
ith other ideas of watering holes that I probably have never been too, much l=
ess thought about.

I'm thinking 6-ish at this point. . but I'm flexable.

Jonathan Calloway

Begin forwarded message:

> From: Jonathan Calloway 
> Date: April 19, 2015 at 2:19:58 AM EDT
> To: Chattanooga Unix Gnu Android Linux Users Group =

> Subject: Chuga-get-together
>=20
> Greetings!
>=20
> As some of you know, I have been working a third shift operations type job=
 now for a year.  This means that I have not been able to attend any Chugalu=
nches or other CHUGALUG events. =20
>=20
> However, this week (4/20-4/24) I will be doing some training in the day ti=
me.  I would like to call a "Chuga-get-together" for one evening this week.
>=20
> Now, I know what the rules are. . . you call the event, you pick the time a=
nd place.  However, as chairman of this event, I would like to open this to t=
he floor for suggestions, so that everyone has the opportunity to chime in o=
n time preferences and places (Besides, you guys always come up with interes=
ting places I haven't heard of before).
>=20
> My only requirements are that it has to be in the evening (after 5PM) and i=
t has to be at a place where adult beverages can be consumed. =20
>=20
> I'm looking forward to seeing you all again!
>=20
> Jonathan Calloway

Remote hand in Nashville

From: Dave Brockman 
------------------------------------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I'm looking for a remote hand in Nashville, TN tomorrow.  Needs to
have a Cisco console cable, ability to connect it via serial to a
Cisco ASA, and type in 5 commands.  Paying gig, super easy 10 minute
call.  Anyone have any leads?

Regards,

dtb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVLDYsAAoJEMP+wtEOVbcdAxQH/2/oMdFE1YIbz0pvd6D/sSkP
2uhA6mD9Hh4b1M8QlMVea2weXVt+Brbcv7bTlWXtdQXSYPHbbWXG/8+khbkmnQ5i
wt4Zzo7SspnEPlKfK7NoK/uNllK9kQNu6brHqQSvmtF0rtXEO6wJGGqEgchpG7nb
2glRnABRQwtrSkNugmuXNlcmz0Wrxf++Gqngr6mcro1fM1IHkiAnBaCfs29y4mRG
pJXgHGoC4LwRMI69R/zg0JcGyo48x1MtBw0l4DRFu/hdrxUdHHl7rb1JP9ZATWu2
FbjKBBoPyVyWh731HxOg8auSYmW9SyXVz6+Vp6XNE/Rv2aXZibBfkB6cfQeCA5o=
=3nqU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Usurping the throne

From: Dave Brockman 
------------------------------------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I do hereby self-appoint myself to the office of President of Chugalug
for the month of April, 2015.



Our first meeting of the month shall be Friday, April 10th at Taco
Mamacita, Northshore location, at 11:30AM.

I will also host two workshops on weekends of this month to teach,
review, and verify proper Ethernet cabling termination.  If you don't
know how to terminate cable, or want to have a peer review of your work,
or just want to shake the rust off of your punch-down tool, please let
me know of your interest and availability.

The workshops will conclude with (or instead of, depending on interest)
a Punch Down Party.  A very special invitation to the PDP is reserved
for someone who knows WTF they are doing with RG6 termination and these
new-fangled compression ends :)  Attendees of the PDP are invited to,
and will be furnished food and beverages, at the PDP after-party.

Hope to see you there!

Regards,

dtb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVJnicAAoJEMP+wtEOVbcdQ54H/0jpgK1BTSiJFzoore4wZhl/
RLEFuPv/WCO+vRFNoRnl+cCFuYIfbi0ZcyTa5oX9GAohGAhn2+lT5gVkH35RHTEn
rFuR1qZxvI7ZMmmRnsnuh4O4jO9bw9RLskBsZ4CHNo6+5ZV/fokcKOcMrVl7Syq7
kSeUQNvylXmuIrN/9tEbKw0DmDU3/5RouAV/0VqaqMKcmJ9gz8dz4HZp7b+JGR8l
L3+3TyIEJQS+wjlOnMJJo3FQdniMwhAfThlTrv2ic/t/LgZFj2X7EXgLAXp9XzSL
bJTkr6wiRee+ePNp5LdBUIy90nx90e3gK66NLD/DPJ4L6dLtSKfNfhSUsmoh03A=
=jd/S
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Free Software Photo Galleries

From: "Robert A. Kelly III" 
------------------------------------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

I wondered if anyone is familiar with a free software photo gallery
that offers facial recognition and tagging similar to most online
services (either natively or via a plugin)? To be clear, I'm talking
about server software to make a photo gallery available over the web.

I'm also curious if you know of any good photo galleries that offer
the option of storing your photos as files on the file system, instead
of in a database.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=ZOt2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Chugalug Digest, Vol 31, Issue 81

From: "Kite, Mike" 
------------------------------------------------------
Thanks Lynn and Meuon.

Putting a pipe between domain and user bears the same bitter fruit :(

It's an OEL6 server, which I think, is pretty close, in this case, to RHEL6.

It does indeed have the return code -6 in /var/log/messages when trying to CIFS mount it.
And I may as well just keep trying smbmount rather than smbget, simply because I'll need to put files there as well as get them.

I'm trying to find the Red Hat article you mention, though this machine does not have a  /etc/request-key.d/ folder.  I do have a Red Hat portal account, I'm trying to recover my pwd to that now.

Thanks
mkite