I *want* to use Firefox for their focus on privacy, such as their interface for warning users about self-signed certs, but it is far less stable than Chrome in my experience.<div><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 9:19 PM, Dave Brockman <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:dave@brockmans.com" target="_blank">dave@brockmans.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im">-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----<br>
Hash: SHA1<br>
<br>
</div><div class="im">On 3/8/2013 9:18 PM, Dave Brockman wrote:<br>
> On 3/8/2013 4:53 PM, Daniel L. Appleget wrote:<br>
>> <a href="http://feross.org/fill-disk/" target="_blank">http://feross.org/fill-disk/</a><br>
><br>
><br>
> My take on TFA is that I should continue using Firefox?<br>
<br>
</div>(because stupid shit like this, adhering to standards and all) is why<br>
I use it in the first place?<br>
<div class="im"><br>
Regards,<br>
<br>
dtb<br>
<br>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----<br>
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32)<br>
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - <a href="http://www.enigmail.net/" target="_blank">http://www.enigmail.net/</a><br>
<br>
</div>iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJROpwyAAoJEMP+wtEOVbcdfDkH/jcaazSiPzQA3w88rHP65GWV<br>
T1iT5mVdD1pgOx1vVY7X1+ej/nGZoWDB+8FpHUMvrfcskaY0Fanmq5S3Z1MySK5Y<br>
a8gx8F1UKcCkWAkUAbqxHlafC8oZ22y9ECzgRslvyPGHga7rVWptqd89fiaxXpgx<br>
snDCnjDLvzhfSY+/2AL0TsTaF3vZAfanW7ZPxyZvT31Q9caowxpv68Rj2GShoYME<br>
lTuyX+NdkCYQLXB9o/f1LBX7lMRto70Pit8TN7L/VSrwXc18G/b8fK62ZtDkmYwB<br>
xh/J8nvRGDb8JpIMS/j/ocBBhd3jK2B/pluXk0erPfWHrppIpldmhcvV8x6UBfg=<br>
=nzKB<br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Chugalug mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Chugalug@chugalug.org">Chugalug@chugalug.org</a><br>
<a href="http://chugalug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/chugalug" target="_blank">http://chugalug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/chugalug</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>