[Chugalug] btrfs experiences?
joseph.simoneau at gmail.com
Sun Mar 16 02:40:07 UTC 2014
Samba isn't a requirement... no windows boxes on the radar except
single-purpose VMs (no real storage) and things that are supposed to break.
Everything I actually need is relatively filesystem agnostic (NFS, DNLA,
ZFS is on my radar, but the more mdadm-like management of btrfs is what's
winning me over, at least in theory. Party of the project is archiving DVDs
and blu-rays, and I'd rather not have to grow the array by waiting for
disks to die or stripping in new vdevs.
I don't think performance is a huge concern, the throughout I'm getting in
all-virtual tests is plenty for a couple HD streams, and incremental
backups can take all night for all I care. VM storage is probably going to
be handled separately, and that's the more performance-intensive task.
On Mar 15, 2014 1:37 PM, "Dave Brockman" <dave at brockmans.com> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> On 3/15/2014 1:32 PM, Dave Brockman wrote:
> > On 3/15/2014 12:32 PM, Alex Smith (K4RNT) wrote:
> >> It also has SMB support built-in, without the need to tweak with
> >> a Samba config file.
> > Say what?
> You must mean the kernel CIFS server. Which isn't available across
> all ZFS implementations (or OSes) unfortunately.
> - --
> "Some things in life can never be fully appreciated nor understood
> unless experienced firsthand. Some things in networking can never be
> fully understood by someone who neither builds commercial networking
> equipment nor runs an operational network." RFC 1925
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Chugalug mailing list
> Chugalug at chugalug.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Chugalug