[Chugalug] Is LibreOffice *THAT* bad? :(
chad78 at gmail.com
Sat Sep 28 17:36:10 UTC 2013
Yeah, because everyone remembers every math problem they ever did.
*- Chad W. Smith*
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 11:54 AM, wes <wes at the-wes.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 7:32 AM, <kitepilot at kitepilot.com> wrote:
>> Just to clarify:
>> the program *DID MATH WRONG*.
>> means just that.
>> No excel import, no weird things here.
>> This was freshly created (albeit complex) spreadsheet.
>> Cells would display wrong numbers or not at all.
>> I could position the cursor in a cell and see a simple formula yielding a
>> bad result.
>> This were problems that you'd figure basic testing would catch.
>> It was, in short, completely unreliable... :(
> if it was just a simple formula, you should be able to give us the formula.
>> Chad Smith writes:
>>> Everyone who going to bat for LibreOffice - did you miss the part where
>>> said that the program *DID MATH WRONG*.
>>> That's not some "obscure feature set" needed only by "power users" or
>>> people who are afraid of change.... That's the one thing that no
>>> **computer** program should ever get wrong.
>>> COMPUTER... it computes. That is its original intention. It's native
>>> language is 1s and 0s. A computer spreadsheet that can't do math
>>> is not just useless - it's dangerous and should be avoided like the
>>> I like the idea of Libre/Open Office. It is what introduced me to open
>>> source as being a thing that exists. But if Calc (the name of the
>>> Spreadsheet mode of the program) can't Calculate - it shouldn't be
>>> to continue to exist... not until they fix that. omg.
>>> *- Chad W. Smith*
>> Chugalug mailing list
>> Chugalug at chugalug.org
> Chugalug mailing list
> Chugalug at chugalug.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Chugalug