[Chugalug] Raspberry Pi on track to sell more units than Apple II computers
ub3ratl4sf00 at gmail.com
Thu Nov 7 01:45:42 UTC 2013
Until Windows disappears, x86/x86-64 goes the way of the Dodo, PC will be
around in one form or another.
Until that time, the 'Death' of the PC will just be overblown hype by media
groups hoping to sell a subscription. Mutation is not death, changing forms
isn't really death either. The car isn't the same form factor it was in the
1950s or the 1920s, did it stop being the car?
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 8:28 PM, Chad Smith <chad78 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Ok - but when people talk about the death of the PC - they are not talking
> about servers. That's why your definition isn't the same as the one they
> are using.
> *- Chad W. Smith*
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 7:17 PM, Stephen Kraus <ub3ratl4sf00 at gmail.com>wrote:
>> Technically? Yes. A Server is just an overpowered PC. How is that NOT a
>> PC? Beyond the fact that you are arguing that its purpose isn't a
>> 'personal' purpose. Yet I can take a Server out of service, throw
>> practically any flavor OS on it, and it'll work. Hell, I had a server I
>> used for PC gaming for a long time, was one of the BEST gaming PCs I ever
>> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 8:01 PM, Chad Smith <chad78 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> So a super-computer array of servers is a PC - if they are using x86-64
>>> If so, then the PC is not going to die any time soon.
>>> I think that is *your* definition of a PC, and a fine one at that. But
>>> it isn't the same definition everyone is using when they talk about the
>>> "Death of the PC". Usually (and everyone is different, so this is not
>>> universally the case) they are talking about a Desktop or a Laptop -
>>> regardless of CPU, so an Apple ][ would count, and so would an iBook, and
>>> so would an ARM netbook running some form of Linux.
>>> The distinction is being drawn between a PC and a Tablet. So - to me,
>>> that indicates they are referring mainly to the form factor, not the CPU.
>>> The other distinction - and one you seem to be referring to when you
>>> mention the CPU - is the OS. Windows/OS X/Desktop Linux vs.
>>> The problem is - Android can run on x86-64, what about Chrome? or an XP
>>> phone? And where does Windows 8 RM fit?
>>> I know you've answered some of those questions for your own
>>> understanding of it, and reasoning for it. But I think your definition
>>> being different from the people making those claims is one of the main
>>> reasons you think it's a silly thought, and they don't.
>>> If you defined PC the same way they are using it, then it might not be
>>> so unreasonable to think of the PC as dying.
>>> And, as we've discussed before - a format being "Dead" doesn't mean it's
>>> no longer used by anyone anywhere.
>>> Betamax is dead - and so is VHS for that matter - but people still use
>>> both. 8-Tracks, LPs, cassettes, floppy discs... SCSI drives.... Windows
>>> 95.... All "Dead" - but not completely removed from existence.
>>> (The office where I used to work had a Windows 95 machine running up
>>> until 2010.)
>>> *- Chad W. Smith*
>>> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Stephen Kraus <ub3ratl4sf00 at gmail.com>wrote:
>>>> X86 or x86-64 is PC. Therefore Surface Pro is a PC. Android Tablet or
>>>> iPad? Not PC.
>>>> PC must be IBM compatible.
>>> Chugalug mailing list
>>> Chugalug at chugalug.org
>> Chugalug mailing list
>> Chugalug at chugalug.org
> Chugalug mailing list
> Chugalug at chugalug.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Chugalug