[Chugalug] Another Cisco Question
dwrudy at gmail.com
Tue Aug 13 16:30:14 UTC 2013
I actually have a client that uses the Ubiquity APs. They work fine, but
what I don't like about them is the Java-based controller that you have to
use with them. I didn't set them up, but the person who did, didn't relay
any information to me about them, so I basically had to go in and figure
everything out (I didn't have any passwords, and in the course of "figuring
things out" I managed to break the software by uninstalling what I thought
was an old version of Java from the server).
Took me a while, but I know how they work now. Again, I like them - they're
nice - but I just don't like that Java-based controller software!
I did just find the WAP321, which looks like its cheaper for (almost) the
same feature sets. Another option is Meraki - I sat in on a Meraki "Intro
to Cloud Networking" webinar a couple weeks ago, and I know they have some
And yes, there's also Ubiquity, which I haven't ruled out yet.
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 12:11 PM, Dave Brockman <dave at brockmans.com> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> On 8/13/2013 11:46 AM, David White wrote:
> > Does anyone have experience with the Aironet 1040 APs? Do you love
> > them or hate them? Would you recommend something else for the same
> > capabilities?
> I've used other Aironet APs, not the 1040 specifically. I find them
> overpriced and underpowered for most of the needs of my clients.
> Right now, my AP of choise is an Engenius EAP600 Dual-Band units for
> standalone deployments. Ubiquity uses the same hardware, but has a
> "software controller" you can use for multiple units. It's free and
> runs on XP+.
> > Reviewing the datasheet
> > (
> it seems that I won't need to get an additional controller and can
> > configure it as a stand-alone device - is this correct?
> AFAIK, all Cisco Aironet APs can operate in autonomous or controller
> mode. The older units you have to change the firmware to switch
> between the two modes.
> > What if, down the road, I want to add a 2nd 1040 to the network?
> > Would I need to get a controller at that point, or would I still be
> > able to configure the two devices to talk to each other?
> Define "talk to each other". They are network devices, if your
> network is configured correctly, they can talk all day long. I
> suspect your question isn't answered by me telling you they can talk
> CDP all day long to each other....
> If you want centralized management, the "self-healing" stuff, the
> seamless roaming, you need a controller.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Chugalug mailing list
> Chugalug at chugalug.org
Founder & CEO
Computing, Equipping, Networking, Training & Supporting
Nonprofit Organizations Worldwide
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Chugalug