[Chugalug] OS Hardware & Makerbot's reversal

Jason Griffey griffey at gmail.com
Thu Sep 27 16:22:43 UTC 2012

I don't think Makerbot cares or even notices Tangibot, frankly. I
think that Makerbot, like many companies, took investment $$ and now
has to find a way to crank the return on investment up. One way to do
this is to move from the Apple I to the Macintosh...that is,
transition your hardware from open, kit type to slick and immediately
useful type. That seems to me to be what they are doing with the
Replicator 2.

I've got a Replicator 1 sitting on the desk next to me. It's a
wonderful machine, but I would rank it's user-friendliness about a 6
on a 1-10 scale. They need a 9 in order to really make the sort of
hardware that is usable by non-geeks. That's what they are after.

And goodness knows it's not like there aren't 9087234967234 other 3D
printers out there at this point competing with them. If they are
going more closed, there's plenty of choice.


On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 8:57 AM, William Wade <willm.wade at gmail.com> wrote:
> What do yall think about the recent news
> (http://news.cnet.com/8301-32973_3-57520633-296/pulling-back-from-open-source-hardware-makerbot-angers-some-adherents/)
> with Makerbot going less open source?
> It is in response to the Tangibot project to make a cheaper version of
> it, but it is odd in my viewpoint. Makerbot had the name and due to
> the nature of open source the changes that enabled the Tangibot to be
> cheaper could have been (if desired) merged back into the Makerbot's
> stuff. I think Makerbot is cutting themselves off from a bunch of free
> inovations. On top of all that it undermines the goal of 3D printers
> for everyone.
> _______________________________________________
> Chugalug mailing list
> Chugalug at chugalug.org
> http://chugalug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/chugalug

More information about the Chugalug mailing list