[Chugalug] Android tablets

Phil Sieg phil.sieg at gmail.com
Sat Oct 13 16:27:07 UTC 2012


Actually my assumption is based on other factors:

1. GSM phones make migrating from carrier to carrier easier, even if
the devices are initially locked. This would have forced "unlocking"
into the mainstream much more quickly, as there is a lot less
incentive to "unlock" a CDMA device as it has to be programmed at the
"store" to be operable on the network. This alone forces the price of
service, and handsets down.

2. Everyone using GSM tower tech would mean much more crossover
roaming and reciprocal agreements which results in outstanding
coverage for the customer, at least it has in the rest of the world.

3. "Pay as you go" would have developed much more rapidly in a GSM
only marketplace, and that has been the single largest factor in
driving subscriber costs down.

THOSE are the factors I was considering and they are based on my
experiences elsewhere in the world, and marginally on my experience as
a cellular service provider.

Sent from my iPad

On Oct 13, 2012, at 12:12 PM, Dave Brockman <dave at brockmans.com> wrote:

> Hash: SHA1
> On 10/13/2012 11:06 AM, Phil Sieg wrote:
>> Service prices would now be HALF what they are if ALL USA service
>> providers had always been GSM. Don't even get me started on how
>> long it took us to get cool phones!!!
> Phil,
>  I disagree.  Your point assumes that cost of technology would
> dictate pricing to consumers.  You and I know better, especially in
> the land of telecoms, wired or wireless.
> Regards,
> dtb
> - --
> "Some things in life can never be fully appreciated nor
> understood unless experienced firsthand. Some things in
> networking can never be fully understood by someone who neither
> builds commercial networking equipment nor runs an operational
> network."  RFC 1925
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/
> iEYEARECAAYFAlB5kagACgkQABP1RO+tr2RYLwCgmqoNzbNNwSZKAf8mu147Maqx
> yBkAoL9YbjgmXINF2m5CA4XaJmJ8X3Qa
> =N023
> _______________________________________________
> Chugalug mailing list
> Chugalug at chugalug.org
> http://chugalug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/chugalug

More information about the Chugalug mailing list