[Chugalug] Richard Stallman and open source
ub3ratl4sf00 at gmail.com
Sat Dec 15 00:04:38 UTC 2012
Except in most cases, unless you have special arrangement with your
company, you don't get to license your code. Your company does.
But in the long run, I don't think your code matters, its what the end
result of all your coding is.
And as we have seen, time and again, companies are going so far to
copyright codes that is so commonly used that is borderlines on pathetic.
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 6:51 PM, DaWorm <daworm at gmail.com> wrote:
> > But, if I choose to LICENSE my code -- make it conditionally available
> -- you would say I have no right to do so? I'm limited to all or nothing,
> accordingly to you? WTF?
> I believe Chad is saying that according to Stallman, you should not be
> allowed to "LICENSE" your code in the first place. You should be required
> to make it completely and totally free. At the same time, neither should
> Chad be allowed sell a product without giving away the code, whether he
> wrote it himself or copied it from you. Under RMS's vision of the world,
> there should be no software that the source isn't freely available and
> freely modifiable, no matter where it came from.
> Can't say I agree with that view of the world. In that world, the only
> time anyone would ever get paid for writing software would be by the first
> person/company that wanted that software. No one else would ever have need
> to pay for it again. Maybe for documentation or support or even bug fixes
> if the need is great enough and you can't wait for someone else to pay to
> have it fixed, but not for the software itself.
> Not sure I could make a living in that world.
> Chugalug mailing list
> Chugalug at chugalug.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Chugalug