[Chugalug] Richard Stallman and open source
chad78 at gmail.com
Fri Dec 14 05:55:26 UTC 2012
And the fact that you like him doesn't mean we should accept his views.
Nobody has given any reason to listen to him. He wrote some stuff back in
the 70s and shared it? Great! So did thousands of other programmers.
Agree with him, don't agree with him - that's up to you. The man gets far
more credit than he deserves, and he works hard to make sure that happens.
He tries to set himself up as Tesla to Linus' Edison (as in the Internet's
belief that Tesla was the brains and Edison just took credit for it) - or
Wozniak to Linus' Jobs - but he's not worth comparing to any one of those 4
Has he done more to advance computers than I have? Absolutely. I haven't
written a single line of code other than webpages.
Does what he's done mean everyone should give a flying fart what he thinks
about stuff? Nope...
*- Chad W. Smith*
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 11:00 PM, Stephen Kraus <ub3ratl4sf00 at gmail.com>wrote:
> Chad, I'm sorry, your personal dislike for him is biasing everything you
> are saying. While I'd be more that glad to agree that he is weird and
> creepy, the way you talk about him just kind of smears everything you say.
> You make him sound like the guy creeping down the street flashing people.
> And unfortunately, until you can prove that he is, I can't take what you
> are saying at face value.
> He is weird, yes. He is creepy, yes. His views are unorthodox, yes.
> Doesn't invalidate everything he has ever said or done though, and
> CERTAINLY doesn't mean we should shun his work or his views.
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 11:55 PM, Chad Smith <chad78 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> He is a freak - a creep - a weirdo - and an extremist.
>> I readily admitted that I do not like him as a person.
>> Now - what views of his do I disagree with? That open source is the only
>> way to go. That without open source the world's data would be locked up in
>> the control a few corporations. That he himself did more for Linux than
>> Linus. That "what people refer to as Linux is really GNU". That people
>> should listen to him at all about anything.
>> Before there was an OpenOffice.org or an AbiWord - there were tons of
>> for-profit, closed-source programs that could open Microsoft Office
>> documents. And there still are.
>> As long as there is a need for people to have access to their data, there
>> will be a market for it. If there is a market for it, then someone with
>> the skills to make it happen and/or the drive to make it happen will...
>> make it happen.
>> No one has to give away their time, talents, and creativity. I am glad
>> that they do - and grateful, but it is not a "need" - it is not a necessity
>> nor an imperative. It is a nice thing. It is a cool thing. But it is not
>> a need thing.
>> I don't believe in software patents. I don't even actually agree with
>> copyrights at all. But I also don't believe anyone should have to be
>> forced to share what they've done, what they've created if they don't want
>> to. You can write a piece of software, and sell it, and make it hard to
>> copy without permission - without a copyright. And you can share your
>> software freely, if you choose to - without sharing the source code.
>> Freeware, Shareware, Trialware... these things have existed for decades.
>> *- Chad W. Smith*
>> Chugalug mailing list
>> Chugalug at chugalug.org
> Chugalug mailing list
> Chugalug at chugalug.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Chugalug